Posted on September 30, 2022 (Updated on July 22, 2025)

Is there a software or means that can generate piper diagrams without some data?

Data & Analysis

Okay, here’s a revised version of the blog post, aiming for a more human and conversational tone:

Piper Diagrams from Thin Air? When Your Water Data Isn’t Quite “All There”

Piper diagrams – those cool-looking triangular charts – are a hydrochemist’s best friend. They’re fantastic for quickly visualizing and understanding the chemical makeup of water, letting you see at a glance what “family” a water sample belongs to. Ideally, you need a complete set of data on the major players: calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium (the cations), and bicarbonate, carbonate, chloride, sulfate, and nitrate (the anions). But what if your data is… well, a little sparse? Can you still whip up a useful Piper diagram, or are you stuck with a blank page?

Let’s cut to the chase: you can’t conjure a perfect Piper diagram out of nothing. It’s like trying to bake a cake without flour – the basic ingredients just aren’t there. The diagram plots the relative percentages of those major ions, so without those numbers, you’re sunk. However, all’s not lost! Depending on how incomplete your data is, there are some clever tricks and workarounds that can give you a decent approximation, or at least point you in the right direction. Think of it as hydrochemical detective work.

Why the Data Gaps? It Happens!

Trust me, I’ve been there. Incomplete water chemistry data is surprisingly common. Maybe the budget only stretched so far, and you could only analyze for certain things. Perhaps you couldn’t get to all the sampling spots you wanted. Or, you’re digging through old records, and some of the measurements are simply missing because the old methods weren’t as comprehensive as what we have today. Sometimes, in a crisis – like a spill – you’re laser-focused on the contaminants and don’t have time for the full ion rundown. Life happens, and data goes missing.

Okay, So How Do We Fake It (Sort Of)?

Alright, so you’re missing some pieces of the puzzle. Here’s how you might try to fill in the blanks and still get something useful out of your data:

  • Guessing Game (But a Smart One): Estimating Missing Values. If you’re only missing a few data points, you might be able to make an educated guess.

    • Charge Balance to the Rescue: Remember electroneutrality from chemistry class? The positive charges have to balance the negative charges. So, if you’re missing one ion, you might be able to estimate it based on the others. But be warned: this is a bit like balancing your checkbook when you’ve lost a few receipts – it’s easy to be off! This works best when you’re only missing one thing and the water isn’t too crazy concentrated.
    • Geochemical Modeling: Getting Fancy. Software like PHREEQC (I’ve used it a ton!) can actually model the water chemistry and estimate what’s missing based on what you do know. It’s like simulating what should be there based on the geology and water processes. This requires some serious know-how, though.
    • Statistical Magic: Imputation. You can train statistical models on existing datasets from similar areas to predict the missing values. It’s like saying, “Hey, water in this kind of environment usually has this much of that.” But you need a good training dataset and need to double check if the imputed values make sense.

  • Piper Diagram Alternatives: When Triangles Just Won’t Work. If you’re missing too much data for a Piper diagram, don’t despair! There are other ways to visualize your water chemistry.

    • Stiff Diagrams: The Polygons of Water. These diagrams show the ion concentrations as a polygon shape. You can compare the shapes to see how water quality changes from place to place or over time. Even if you’re missing a few ions, you can still get a sense of the overall pattern.
    • Durov Diagrams: The Hybrid Approach. This is a combo plot with ternary diagrams and a square plot. It’s pretty versatile and can help you classify water types and see if there’s any mixing going on, even if your data isn’t perfect.

  • Focus, Focus, Focus: What’s Really Important? Sometimes, you don’t need the whole picture. If you’re worried about saltwater creeping into your freshwater, for example, just focus on chloride and sodium. A simple plot of those two might tell you everything you need to know.

    • Software to the Rescue (Kind Of)

    No software can magically invent data, but some can help you with these tricks:

    • PHREEQC, GWB: For those fancy geochemical models.
    • R, Python: If you’re into statistical imputation, these are your tools.
    • Excel, Google Sheets: For basic charge balance and simple charts.
    • AquaChem: A dedicated hydrochemistry package that often has tools for estimating missing data.

    A Word of Caution (Seriously, Pay Attention)

    Look, messing with incomplete data is risky. You’re introducing uncertainty, and your results might not be as accurate. An inaccurate diagram can lead you down the wrong path. Always, always validate your estimated values and alternative diagrams with whatever data you do have and your understanding of the local hydrogeology.

    The Bottom Line

    While a perfect Piper diagram needs perfect data, you can sometimes squeeze useful information out of incomplete datasets. Estimate carefully, consider alternatives, and always be skeptical. But honestly, the best approach is always to collect complete, accurate data in the first place. When that’s not possible, a little creativity and caution can go a long way. Good luck, and happy hydro-sleuthing!

    You may also like

    Long-Term Map & Document Storage: The Ideal Way to Preserve Physical Treasures

    Why does NOAA no longer provide sunshine data?

    How are data from tiltmeters used to monitor volcanic activity?