What are the three most commonly used developable surfaces used to create map projections?
Space & NavigationMaps: It’s All About the Curve (or Lack Thereof!)
Ever tried to flatten an orange peel perfectly? Yeah, doesn’t work, does it? That’s the challenge cartographers face every time they try to make a map. You’re taking a round-ish object – our Earth – and smooshing it onto a flat surface. Something’s gotta give, and that “give” is distortion. But here’s where things get clever: cartographers use “developable surfaces” to minimize the damage.
Think of a developable surface as a middleman. It’s a shape you can flatten without ripping or stretching it. The Earth’s features get projected onto this shape first, and then it’s flattened into a map. Sounds complicated? It kinda is, but the good news is that most map projections rely on just three basic shapes: cylinders, cones, and planes. Let’s dive in!
Cylinders: Wrapping the Globe Like a Label
Imagine wrapping a giant paper towel roll around the Earth. That’s the basic idea behind cylindrical projections. You project the Earth’s landmasses onto the cylinder, unroll it, and boom – you’ve got a map. If the cylinder is lined up with the Earth’s axis (north to south), you get a map where the lines of longitude are straight up and down, and the lines of latitude are horizontal.
The most famous example? Gotta be the Mercator projection. You’ve seen it – it’s the one that makes Greenland look HUGE. While it’s great for navigation because it keeps angles accurate locally, it really messes with the size of things, especially near the poles. So, cylindrical projections are best when you need to map the whole world, or just the areas around the equator.
And there are variations! The Transverse Mercator, for instance, turns the cylinder on its side. This way, you get less distortion along a north-south strip of the Earth. Pretty neat, huh?
Cones: Perfect for Pie-Shaped Regions
Now, picture placing a cone over the Earth, like an ice cream cone. Conic projections work by projecting the Earth onto this cone. Usually, the cone sits on the globe along a specific line of latitude – we call this the “standard parallel.” When you slice the cone open and flatten it, you end up with a map that has converging lines for longitude and curved lines for latitude.
These projections are awesome for mapping regions that stretch east to west in the mid-latitudes. Think of the United States, or even Australia. The further you get from that “standard parallel,” though, the more things get distorted. The Albers Equal Area Conic projection is a popular choice for the US because it keeps the areas accurate. And the Lambert Conformal Conic? That one’s all about preserving shapes, whether you’re looking at a small area or the whole shebang.
Planes: A Bird’s-Eye View (Especially of the Poles)
Last but not least, we’ve got planar projections. These are like shining a light through the Earth onto a flat piece of paper. The paper touches the globe at just one point, and most often, that point is one of the poles.
If you’re looking at a polar projection, the lines of longitude radiate out from the pole like spokes on a bicycle wheel, and the lines of latitude form circles around it. These are super handy for mapping the Arctic or Antarctic. Plus, directions from the center point are spot-on, and any straight line drawn through the center is actually the shortest distance between those two points in real life.
The cool thing about planar projections is that you can change where you’re “looking” from. The gnomonic projection is like viewing the Earth from its very center, while the stereographic projection is like looking from the opposite side of the planet. Different viewpoints, different maps!
Tangent or Secant? It Matters!
Quick vocab lesson: a developable surface can be “tangent” or “secant” to the globe. Tangent means it just touches the Earth at one point or line. Secant means it slices through the Earth. Secant projections usually have less distortion overall because they have two lines where things are super accurate.
The Big Picture
So, there you have it: cylinders, cones, and planes. These three shapes are the unsung heroes behind almost every map you’ve ever seen. Understanding them helps you appreciate the choices cartographers make and why no map is ever truly perfect. It’s all about picking the right tool for the job and knowing what kind of distortion you can live with. Happy mapping!
You may also like
Disclaimer
Categories
- Climate & Climate Zones
- Data & Analysis
- Earth Science
- Energy & Resources
- Facts
- General Knowledge & Education
- Geology & Landform
- Hiking & Activities
- Historical Aspects
- Human Impact
- Modeling & Prediction
- Natural Environments
- Outdoor Gear
- Polar & Ice Regions
- Regional Specifics
- Review
- Safety & Hazards
- Software & Programming
- Space & Navigation
- Storage
- Water Bodies
- Weather & Forecasts
- Wildlife & Biology
New Posts
- Does Walmart Sell Training Wheels? Let’s Break it Down.
- Osprey Daylite Commuter: Is This Your Next Go-To Pack?
- JEKYQ Water Shoes Quick Dry Floating – Is It Worth Buying?
- Giants Take the Bay: A More Human Look Back at the 2019 Bay Bridge Series
- Siamese Drinking Backpack Travel Daypack – Is It Worth Buying?
- Print Patterned Outdoor Double Layered Fisherman – Is It Worth Buying?
- Vertical Limit’s Killer Peak: The Real Story Behind K2
- Roaming with the Dinos: A Review of the GTKSYNVE Crossbody Bag
- Rappelling: Sport or Just a Way Down? Let’s Talk Ropes.
- Nike Sportswear Essentials Sling Bag (8L): My New Go-To for Urban Adventures
- Bucket Protection Foldable Outdoor Fishing – Review
- Conquering the Giant: Your Guide to Climbing Mont Ventoux (Without Dying)
- Rocky Waterproof Snakeproof Hunting Breakup – Buying Guide
- Coconut Backpack Daypack Pockets Shopping – Buying Guide