Skip to content
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Geology
    • Geography
    • Space and Astronomy
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
Our Planet TodayAnswers for geologist, scientists, spacecraft operators
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Geology
    • Geography
    • Space and Astronomy
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
on May 25, 2024

Clouds Obstructed the 2017 Total Solar Eclipse Across North America

Sun

Contents:

  • The Great American Eclipse of 2017 and Cloud Cover
  • Meteorological conditions leading up to the eclipse
  • Regions with significant cloud obscuration
  • Lessons learned and implications for future eclipses
  • FAQs

The Great American Eclipse of 2017 and Cloud Cover

On August 21, 2017, a total solar eclipse swept across the contiguous United States, captivating millions of viewers and marking a historic celestial event. However, the experience was not without its challenges, as cloud cover obscured the view in certain regions and prevented some observers from fully appreciating the magnitude of the eclipse.

In this article, we delve into the factors that contributed to cloud cover during the 2017 American eclipse and explore the regions that were most affected, providing valuable insights for future eclipse chasers and researchers.

Meteorological conditions leading up to the eclipse

The path of totality for the 2017 solar eclipse traversed a variety of climates and weather patterns across the United States. In the weeks leading up to the event, meteorologists closely monitored developing atmospheric conditions to predict the likelihood of cloud cover during the eclipse.
One of the primary factors influencing cloud cover was the presence of high pressure systems and the associated clear skies. Areas under the influence of high-pressure ridges, such as the Pacific Northwest and parts of the Northern Great Plains, experienced mostly clear skies during the eclipse. Conversely, regions affected by low-pressure systems and frontal boundaries, such as the Midwest and Southeast, were more prone to increased cloud cover.

In addition, the presence of moisture sources, such as the Gulf of Mexico and the Great Lakes, contributed to the formation of cloud systems that obscured the view of the eclipse in certain regions. Understanding the prevailing weather patterns and their impact on cloud cover is crucial for predicting and planning future eclipse observations.

Regions with significant cloud obscuration

While the 2017 eclipse was visible across much of the United States, some regions experienced more significant cloud cover than others, limiting the visibility of the celestial event.
One of the hardest hit areas was the Midwest, particularly the states of Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio. These regions were affected by a complex weather pattern that brought a mix of clouds and precipitation, making it difficult for observers to see the full eclipse. The presence of warm, moist air from the Gulf of Mexico, combined with a frontal system, resulted in widespread cloud cover that obscured the view of the sun.

Another region that experienced significant cloud obstruction was the Southeast, including states such as Tennessee, Georgia, and the Carolinas. Similar to the Midwest, this area was affected by the interaction of different air masses that led to the formation of clouds that blocked the view of the eclipse in many places.

Understanding the specific meteorological factors that contributed to the cloud cover in these regions can help eclipse chasers and researchers better anticipate and plan for potential obstacles in future eclipse events.

Lessons learned and implications for future eclipses

The 2017 American Eclipse provided valuable lessons and insights for the scientific community, meteorologists, and eclipse enthusiasts alike. The challenges posed by cloud cover during this event highlighted the importance of comprehensive weather forecasting and planning for future eclipses.

A key lesson is the need for improved monitoring and modeling of atmospheric conditions in the days and hours leading up to an eclipse. By improving the accuracy of weather forecasts, eclipse organizers and observers can make more informed decisions about the best viewing locations and make necessary adjustments to their plans.

In addition, the 2017 eclipse has spurred further research into the interactions between atmospheric processes and the visibility of celestial events. Scientists are exploring ways to better understand the formation and movement of cloud systems and their impact on viewing eclipses and other astronomical phenomena.

As the next total solar eclipse approaches the United States in 2024, the lessons learned from 2017 will be critical to ensuring that eclipse chasers and researchers are better prepared to overcome the challenges posed by cloud cover and maximize their viewing opportunities.

FAQs

Here are 5-7 questions and answers about where clouds obscured the American eclipse of August 2017:



Where did clouds obscure the American eclipse of August 2017?

Clouds obscured parts of the total solar eclipse of August 21, 2017 across the northwestern United States. The eclipse path of totality crossed Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia, and North and South Carolina. While much of the path experienced clear skies, cloud cover prevented viewing of the total eclipse in some areas, particularly in the Pacific Northwest.

Which states had the most cloud cover during the 2017 eclipse?

Oregon and parts of Idaho experienced the most extensive cloud cover during the 2017 eclipse. Forecasts had predicted mostly clear skies in these areas, but on the day of the eclipse, unexpected cloud formations developed and obscured the view of totality for many observers. Other regions like Wyoming, Nebraska, and Missouri enjoyed mostly clear skies along the path of totality.

How did the cloud cover affect eclipse viewing in 2017?

The cloud cover in some areas significantly diminished the eclipse experience for observers. During totality, the sun’s corona is normally visible, but thick cloud cover prevented this in places like Oregon. Viewers also missed out on seeing the dramatic darkening of the sky and the appearance of stars during the total eclipse phase. The cloud cover reduced the overall awe and wonder of witnessing a total solar eclipse.

Were there any areas that had perfect eclipse viewing in 2017?

Yes, while clouds obscured the eclipse in parts of the Pacific Northwest, other regions along the path of totality enjoyed clear, unobstructed views. Areas like Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming, Beatrice, Nebraska, and locations in Missouri and southern Illinois reported excellent eclipse viewing conditions with sunny skies throughout the event.

How common is cloud cover during total solar eclipses?

Cloud cover is a fairly common occurrence during total solar eclipses, as the event takes place outdoors and is subject to local weather patterns. While clear skies are ideal, eclipse chasers often contend with unpredictable cloud formations that can mar the viewing experience. Careful planning and flexibility are required to increase the chances of witnessing a total eclipse under optimal conditions.



Recent

  • Exploring the Geological Features of Caves: A Comprehensive Guide
  • What Factors Contribute to Stronger Winds?
  • The Scarcity of Minerals: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Earth’s Crust
  • How Faster-Moving Hurricanes May Intensify More Rapidly
  • Adiabatic lapse rate
  • Exploring the Feasibility of Controlled Fractional Crystallization on the Lunar Surface
  • The Greenhouse Effect: How Rising Atmospheric CO2 Drives Global Warming
  • Examining the Feasibility of a Water-Covered Terrestrial Surface
  • What is an aurora called when viewed from space?
  • Measuring the Greenhouse Effect: A Systematic Approach to Quantifying Back Radiation from Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
  • Asymmetric Solar Activity Patterns Across Hemispheres
  • Unraveling the Distinction: GFS Analysis vs. GFS Forecast Data
  • The Role of Longwave Radiation in Ocean Warming under Climate Change
  • Esker vs. Kame vs. Drumlin – what’s the difference?

Categories

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
  • Home
  • About
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright Our Planet Today 2025

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie SettingsAccept
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT